[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1257814906.25961.916.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:01:46 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Obey coherent_dma_mask for alloc_coherent
on passthrough
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 00:46 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> if (iommu_no_mapping(hwdev))
> - return paddr;
> + return paddr > dma_mask - size ? 0 : paddr;
Hm, that's still wrong. If your mask is 0xffffffff and you map
0xfffff000 + 0x1000, that should be allowed, right? How about:
return paddr <= dma_mask - size + 1 ? paddr : 0;
And is this strictly necessary as part of the patch we're discussing?
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists