[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091110110825.GI30802@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:08:25 +0100
From: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dimm <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] x86, ucode-amd: Don't warn when no ucode is available
for a CPU revision
There is no point in warning when there is no ucode available for a
specific CPU revision. Currently the container-file, which provides the
AMD ucode patches for OS load, contains only a few ucode patches.
It's already clearly indicated by the printed patch_level whenever new
ucode was available and an update happened. So the warning message is
of no help but rather annoying on systems with many CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 5 +----
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
index 75538f6..9f13324 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
@@ -105,11 +105,8 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)
i++;
}
- if (!equiv_cpu_id) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "microcode: CPU%d: cpu revision "
- "not listed in equivalent cpu table\n", cpu);
+ if (!equiv_cpu_id)
return 0;
- }
if (mc_header->processor_rev_id != equiv_cpu_id)
return 0;
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists