[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0911100402k4f8648b8ref712f4c60fb8a7b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:02:39 +0100
From: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
To: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, ucode-amd: Load ucode-patches once and not
separately fo each CPU
2009/11/10 Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>:
> This also implies that corresponding log messages, e.g.
>
> platform microcode: firmware: requesting amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin
>
> show up only once on module load and not when ucode is updated for
> each CPU.
I like it.
One remark : should we perhaps provide a means of reloading the cached
firmware? Or is the standard procedure to reload microcode.ko in case
a new firmware file has been installed?
btw., if we could safely assume that all the cpus after the ucode
upgrade share the same version/patch-level of ucode, we would be able
to cache a single ucode instance once and use it for all. I don't
recall anyone clearly stating that such multi-cpu-type systems can't
really exist.
e.g. is it possible to have AMD systems with cpus which differ from
each other not only by their revisions (patch_level)?
-- Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists