linux-kernel - Re: FatELF patches...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:15:48 +0100
From:	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>
To:	weigelt@...ux.de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FatELF patches...

On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:10 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at> wrote:
> 
> > The only remotely useful benefit in the long run I can imagine is: The
> > permanent cross-compiling will make AC_TRY_RUN() go away. Or at least
> > the alternatives are applicable without reading the generated
> > configure.sh (and config.log) to guess how to tell the script some
> > details.
> 
> hmm, that could be the real killer argument - evolutionarily 
> sort out the guys who're too dumb to write proper buildscripts ;-)
Obviously your irony detector triggered;-)

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/