lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AF9A63B.6010101@nortel.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:43:23 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: sunrpc port allocation and IANA reserved list


By default sunrpc ports are allocated at random in the range 665-1023U.
 However, there are many ports within this range which have been
reserved by the IANA (and others like port 921 which are not formally
reserved but are "well-known").

Given that a userspace application can be stopped and restarted at any
time, and a sunrpc registration can happen at any time, what is the
expected mechanism to prevent the kernel from allocating a port for use
by sunrpc that reserved or well-known?

Apparently Redhat and Debian have distro-specific ways of dealing with
this, but is there a standard solution?  Should there be?

The current setup seems suboptimal.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ