lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:44:50 +0900 From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6 Tejun Heo wrote: > The return value is wrong but it wouldn't lead to oops. Correction: It may lead to oops due to wrong end-of-list condition and I just remembered that I was thinking about it when I was modifying the locking and adding the switch block there and then I forgot to actually update the return value of the extend function. So, yeah, three way return value sucks big time. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists