linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP: DMA: Fix omapfb/lcdc on OMAP1510 broken when PM set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:50:19 +0100
From:	Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP: DMA: Fix omapfb/lcdc on OMAP1510 broken when PM set

Monday 09 November 2009 22:14:24 Tony Lindgren napisał(a):
> * Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl> [091105 10:52]:
> > With CONFIG_PM=y, the omapfb/lcdc device on Amstrad Delta, after
> > initially starting correctly, breaks with the following error messages:
> >
> > omapfb omapfb: resetting (status 0xffffff96,reset count 1)
> > ...
> > omapfb omapfb: resetting (status 0xffffff96,reset count 100)
> > omapfb omapfb: too many reset attempts, giving up.
> >
> > Looking closer at this I have found that it had been broken almost 2
> > years ago with commit 2418996e3b100114edb2ae110d5d4acb928909d2, PM fixes
> > for OMAP1.
> >
> > The definite reason for broken omapfb/lcdc behavoiur in PM mode
> > appeared to be ARM_IDLECT1:IDLIF_ARM (bit 6) put into idle regardless of
> > LCD DMA possibly running. The bit were set based on return value of the
> > omap_dma_running() function that did not check for dedicated LCD DMA
> > channel status. The patch below fixes this.
> >
> > Created against linux-2.6.32-rc6
> >
> > Tested on Amstrad Delta
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Tuesday 03 November 2009 21:10:48 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl> [091103 12:05]:
> > > > Sorry, I've not checked for new mail before posting this one and
> > > > missed your acceptance for my idea of fixing all omap1510, not only
> > > > ams_delta. If there are no more comments, I'll submit v3 with
> > > > cpu_is_omap1510() replacing machine_is_ams_delta().
> > >
> > > Sounds good to me.
> > >
> > > Tony
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.32-rc6/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c.orig	2009-11-03 20:37:49.000000000 +0100
> > +++ linux-2.6.32-rc6/arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c	2009-11-05 19:30:39.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -1108,6 +1108,14 @@ int omap_dma_running(void)
> >  {
> >  	int lch;
> >
> > +	/*
> > +	 * On OMAP1510, internal LCD controller will start the transfer
> > +	 * when it gets enabled, so assume DMA running if LCD enabled.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (cpu_is_omap1510())
> > +		if (omap_readw(0xfffec000 + 0x00) & (1 << 0))
> > +			return 1;
> > +
> >  	/* Check if LCD DMA is running */
> >  	if (cpu_is_omap16xx())
> >  		if (omap_readw(OMAP1610_DMA_LCD_CCR) & OMAP_DMA_CCR_EN)
>
> Can you please use some define rather than the 0xfffec000 register
> above?

Tony,
Sure. Expect a follow up very soon.

Thanks,
Janusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/