[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091110210940.GA1590@ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:09:41 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
Cc: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: make the default cursor shape configurable
On Mon 2009-11-09 23:09:44, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:28:03AM +1030, David Newall wrote:
> > Daniel Mack wrote:
> > > And even if the cursor behaviour is changable at runtime, I don't see
> > > why it shouldn't have a selectable compile time default. Which is what
> > > the patch adds.
> >
> >
> > It seems like adding cruft to the kernel that is just as effectively
> > available at run-time. Where does it end? Do we eventually add bash to
> > the kernel?
>
> One more thing:
>
> Clemens' last patch didn't add anything to the kernel's binary size.
> It didn't slow down anything either, as there is no run-time condition
> evaluation. It just makes something configurable which was hard
> coded before. So where's the cruft?
The number of configs to test just got bigger. 100% bigger in
fact. Every single developer will have to answer 'do you want blinking
cursor?' when your patch is merged.
config options _are_ expensive.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists