lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 9 Nov 2009 22:10:22 -0500
From:	Herbert Xu <>
To:	Huang Ying <>
Cc:	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX -v2 for .32] crypto, gcm, fix another complete call in
	complete fuction

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:49:59AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Yes. This is for performance only. Because crypto_gcm_reqctx(req) is not
> so trivial (it needs access tfm), and used by every xxx_done function,
> so I think it is better to just call crypto_gcm_reqctx once and pass it
> down. Do you think so?

Since we only support blocksize == 16, that means the alignment
cannot exceed 16 bytes.  So just always align to 16 bytes and that
should make crypto_gcm_reqctx trivial once optimised by the

Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
Home Page:
PGP Key:
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists