lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:29:33 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <>
To:	Lennart Sorensen <>
CC:	Willy Tarreau <>, Pavel Machek <>,
	Avi Kivity <>,
	Alan Cox <>,
	Matteo Croce <>,
	Sven-Haegar Koch <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
Subject: Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode

On 11/10/2009 02:27 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:19:30PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Willy, perhaps you can come up with a list of features you think should
>> be emulated, together with an explanation of why you opted for that list
>> of features and *did not* opt for others.
>> Note: emulated FPU is a special subcase.  The FPU operations are
>> heavyweight enough that the overhead of trapping versus library calls is
>> relatively insignificant.
> That doesn't seem to be the experience of the arm EABI versus the old
> arm ABI with kernel FPU emulation.  Using user space library calls for
> FPU is vastly faster than the trapping and kernel FPU emulation.

I don't believe we were talking about ARM.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists