[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AF9E94D.5040601@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:29:33 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
CC: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Matteo Croce <technoboy85@...il.com>,
Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@...net.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode
On 11/10/2009 02:27 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:19:30PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Willy, perhaps you can come up with a list of features you think should
>> be emulated, together with an explanation of why you opted for that list
>> of features and *did not* opt for others.
>>
>> Note: emulated FPU is a special subcase. The FPU operations are
>> heavyweight enough that the overhead of trapping versus library calls is
>> relatively insignificant.
>
> That doesn't seem to be the experience of the arm EABI versus the old
> arm ABI with kernel FPU emulation. Using user space library calls for
> FPU is vastly faster than the trapping and kernel FPU emulation.
I don't believe we were talking about ARM.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists