[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091110225926.GA8424@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:59:26 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Remove inline from forward-referenced
functions
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 02:38:30PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 22:27 +0000, tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > rcu: Remove inline from forward-referenced functions
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > index ef2a58c..c03edf7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_preempt_data);
> > /*
> > * Tell them what RCU they are running.
> > */
> > -static inline void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
> > +static void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
> > {
> > printk(KERN_INFO
> > "Experimental preemptable hierarchical RCU implementation.\n");
> > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ void exit_rcu(void)
> > /*
> > * Tell them what RCU they are running.
> > */
> > -static inline void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
> > +static void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
> > {
> > printk(KERN_INFO "Hierarchical RCU implementation.\n");
> > }
>
> non-inline functions in .h files probably aren't a good idea.
;-)
Here are my options:
1. Have a huge #ifdef in kernel/rcutree.c. Not going there.
2. #include kernel/rcutree_plugin.h near the beginning of
kernel/rcutree.c rather than near the end. I originally
had it set up this way, but this results in a large number
of forward references from kernel/rcutree_plugin.h, which
turned out to be a real mess. The current setup is much
nicer, as the forward references serve to document the
plug-in functions that are defined in kernel/rcutree_plugin.h.
3. Leave in the "inline" declarations on the function definitions.
Although all the compilers that -I- use are quite happy with
this, some people's compilers complain. So this is not good,
either.
Please note that kernel/rcutree_plugin.h is internal to RCU -- only
kernel/rcutree.c includes it, so there is no possibility of conflicting
definitions.
Any options that I am missing?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists