[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911111029.13791.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:29:13 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Cc: Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: virtio: Add memory statistics reporting to the balloon driver
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:06:14 am Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:02:06 am Adam Litke wrote:
> >
> >> A simpler approach is to collect memory statistics in the virtio
> >> balloon driver and communicate them to the host via the device config space.
> >>
> >
> > There are two issues I see with this. First, there's an atomicity problem
> > since you can't tell when the stats are consistent.
>
> Actually, config writes always require notification from the guest to
> the host. This means the host knows when they config space is changed
> so atomicity isn't a problem.
I think you missed my point: the stats are inter-related, so they should be
served together.
> In fact, if it were a problem, then the balloon driver would be
> fundamentally broken because target and actual are stored in the config
> space.
No, one is written by the host, the other the guest. Still works.
> If you recall, we had this discussion originally wrt the balloon driver :-)
And I never did get around to the lguest implementation, which would have
seen if this really is an issue.
> > Second, polling is ugly.
>
> As opposed to?
As opposed to giving the stats whenever asked by the host.
> > A stats vq might solve this more cleanly?
> >
>
> actual and target are both really just stats. Had we implemented those
> with a vq, I'd be inclined to agree with you but since they're
> implemented in the config space, it seems natural to extend the config
> space with other stats.
It does, *if* we don't need accuracy. Otherwise, it seems like we need
something else.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists