linux-kernel - Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:17:25 +0530
From:	"ramaswamy.bm" <ramaswamy.bm@...baledgesoft.com>
To:	kaber@...sh.net
CC:	arrow.jianqing@...il.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Subject: RE: port bound SAs : ip xfm state command  ?

What is the command to write port based SA's using ip xfrm state.

iam using below command for writing SA's : 
ip xfrm state add src 192.168.1.20 dst 192.168.1.5 proto esp spi 
0x354cb04b mode tunnel reqid 16385 replay-window 32 auth sha1 
0xecf02a5cf6568556e1bdcd961c7ec3f92afd01cc enc aes 
0x5c0cfa9672ce67ba545b593076dfb278 sel src 0.0.0.0/0 dst 0.0.0.0/0  

Thanks in advance 
Ram


he pfkey / xfrm interface throws them away

i fixed racoon to send the port numbers and they were ignored

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McHardy [mailto:kaber@...sh.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 9:12 AM
To: Paul Moore
Cc: David Miller; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: port bound SAs

Paul Moore wrote:
> i did exactly that (in the original message) and it makes this test
case
> work but as I point out
> 
> a) it should not be necessary 
> b) i get more SAs than I need
> c) i can no longer say that a SA is optional (this is an error in the
> pfkey/xfrm/racoon interface to combine two orthogonal concepts)
> d) I am not convinced that I have resolved all cases. Needs more
testing

IIRC I tested port selectors in SA a few years ago using "ip xfrm"
and they worked fine. The xfrm interface doesn't ignore them 
(copy_from_user_state()), I think the pfkey interface also doesn't.

Please try configuring them manually using "ip xfrm state",
I'm pretty sure the bug is actually in racoon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/