[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:15:02 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>
cc: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhangfx@...ote.com, zhouqg@...il.com,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>,
Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@...glemail.com>,
Patrik Kluba <kpajko79@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/17] tracing: add static function tracer support
for MIPS
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
> > -mlong-calls really degrades performance. I have seen things like 6%
> > drop in network packet forwarding rates with -mlong-calls.
> >
>
> so much drop? seems only two instructions added for it: lui, addi. from
> this view point, I think the -fno-omit-frame-pointer(add, sd, move...)
> will also bring with much drop.
No, register jumps cannot be predicted -- this is where the performance
goes on any serious processor -- the two extra instructions are nothing
compared to that. OTOH frame pointer calculations are pure arithmetic, so
you only lose time incurred by the instructions themselves.
Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists