lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:34:50 +0000 From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/atm: move all compat_ioctl handling to atm/ioctl.c On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 14:30 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > +struct atmif_sioc32 { > + compat_int_t number; > + compat_int_t length; > + compat_caddr_t arg; > +}; > + > +struct atm_iobuf32 { > + compat_int_t length; > + compat_caddr_t buffer; > +}; We already have compat_atmif_sioc and compat_atm_iobuf structures defined -- do those need to be duplicated? Other than that, it looks sane. I wish I'd noticed that we already had half a COMPAT implementation when I added the new bits. Thanks. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists