linux-kernel - posix_fadvise/WILLNEED synchronous on fuse/sshfs instead of async?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:19:37 +0100
From:	Tobias Diedrich <ranma+kernel@...edrich.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: posix_fadvise/WILLNEED synchronous on fuse/sshfs instead of async?

While trying to use posix_fadvise(...POSIX_FADVISE_WILLNEED) to
implement userspace read-ahead (with a bigger read-ahead window than
the kernel default) I found that if the underlying filesystem is
fuse/sshfs posix_fadvise is no longer doing asynchronous reads:

strace -tt with mnt/testfile on sshfs and server with very slow
upstream (ADSL):
5345  00:00:17.334209 open("mnt/testfile", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
5345  00:00:18.011383 _llseek(3, 0, [3544379], SEEK_END) = 0
5345  00:00:18.011626 _llseek(3, 0, [0], SEEK_SET) = 0
5345  00:00:18.012393 fadvise64_64(3, 0, 1048576, POSIX_FADV_WILLNEED) = 0
5345  00:01:02.438097 write(1, "[file] File size is 3544379 byte"..., 34) = 34

Note that fadvise takes 40 seconds...
Is this expected behaviour?
I would have expected that fadvise is always asynchronous and I
could rely on the call to return almost immediately.

-- 
Tobias						PGP: http://8ef7ddba.uguu.de
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/