[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:57:43 -0600
From: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Dynamic Tick: Enabling longer sleep times on 32-bit
machines
john stultz wrote:
> I could have sworn this was in mainline by now, but I recently was
> looking for the code and can't find it there or in -tip either.
>
> Thomas, are they just hiding somewhere I can't find?
>
> Jon, you've been terribly patient and great about resubmitting these
> patches over and over. If I'm not just being crazy and missing these
> patches in front of my nose, are you still willing to submit them
> again? I think they'll be quite useful as folks start pushing the NOHZ
> idle times out.
Absolutely! It is still on my to-do list, but unfortunately, I got busy
with a couple other things.
With regard to the last patch set I submitted for this, Thomas had an
issue with one of the patches. I understand the concern, but I am not
sure which would be the preferred way to handle this. See the below thread:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125062817124381&w=2
If you or Thomas have any feedback on this, I could re-work the patch
against the latest kernel tree.
Cheers
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists