lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:36:17 +0100
From:	Willy Tarreau <>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <>, Pavel Machek <>,
	Avi Kivity <>,
	Alan Cox <>,
	Matteo Croce <>,
	Sven-Haegar Koch <>,
Subject: Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:15:58PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/10/2009 09:52 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > 
> >   - last, the probability of having an NX page just after an
> >     executable one seems too tight to me to even constitute
> >     an attack vector ! BTW, I'm not even certain that all CPUs
> >     correctly implement this check !
> > 
> Do you have *any* *evidence* *whatsoever* for that assertion?!

No, just basic feeling based on implementation cost and difficulty
vs gains as I explained.

> I personally will consider something that doesn't implement proper
> security check to be a potential security hole and will NAK the patch.

Even in the case of the NOPL instruction ? I clearly don't see
the potential security hole !


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists