[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091112214706.7c7b3168.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:47:06 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: sysctl tree build failure
Hi Eric,
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:11:34 -0800 ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
> Any clue how all_noconfig happened to have CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL set?
CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL defaults to y and only depends on
CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL which also defaults to y and depends on CONFIG_PROC_FS
which also defaults to y. All three are only selectable if
CONFIG_EMBEDDED is y (which it obviously isn't).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists