| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20091112113343.GA1386@elte.hu> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:33:43 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com> Cc: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>, Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com> Subject: Re: [ RFC, PATCH - 1/2, v2 ] x86-microcode: refactor microcode output messages -tip testing found the following bug - there's a _long_ boot delay of 58.6 seconds if the CPU family is not supported: [ 1.421761] calling microcode_init+0x0/0x137 @ 1 [ 1.426532] platform microcode: firmware: requesting amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin [ 61.433126] microcode: failed to load file amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin [ 61.439682] microcode: CPU0: AMD CPU family 0xf not supported [ 61.445441] microcode: CPU1: AMD CPU family 0xf not supported [ 61.451273] Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@...azian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba [ 61.459116] initcall microcode_init+0x0/0x137 returned 0 after 58625622 usecs Where does this delay come from? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists