lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AFBFA09.5010600@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:05:29 +0000
From:	Jonathan Cameron <kernel@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To:	Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com>
CC:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] AMI305 magnetometer driver

Hi Samu,

I'll leave the question of location for later debate and stick to review in this
email.

Couple of points below. 

> Provide support for AMI305 / AK8974 magnetometer chips.
> coordinates are provided as polled input device.
> Selftest and noise filtering (polled input device fuzziness)
> are provided via sysfs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/Kconfig       |   11 +
>  drivers/misc/Makefile      |    1 +
>  drivers/misc/ami305.c      |  644 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/i2c/ami305.h |   22 ++
>  4 files changed, 678 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/misc/ami305.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/i2c/ami305.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> index df1f86b..d9d0efc 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> @@ -246,6 +246,17 @@ config EP93XX_PWM
>  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will
>  	  be called ep93xx_pwm.
>  
> +config AMI305
> +	 tristate "AMI305";
> +	 depends on I2C
> +	 default n
> +	 ---help---
> +	   Say Y here if you want to build a driver for AMI305 magnetometer
> +	   chip.
> +
> +	   To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> +	   module will be called ami305. If unsure, say N here.
> +
>  source "drivers/misc/c2port/Kconfig"
>  source "drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig"
>  source "drivers/misc/cb710/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Makefile b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> index f982d2e..bb5f969 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SGI_GRU)		+= sgi-gru/
>  obj-$(CONFIG_HP_ILO)		+= hpilo.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ISL29003)		+= isl29003.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EP93XX_PWM)	+= ep93xx_pwm.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_AMI305)		+= ami305.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_C2PORT)		+= c2port/
>  obj-y				+= eeprom/
>  obj-y				+= cb710/
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ami305.c b/drivers/misc/ami305.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ead0190
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ami305.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,644 @@
> +/*
> + * ami305.c is driver for AMI305 (Aichi Steel) and
> + * AK8974 (Asahi Kasei EMD Corporation) magnetometer chip
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies).
> + *
> + * Contact: Samu Onkalo <samu.p.onkalo@...ia.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
> + * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.	 See the GNU
> + * General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
> + * 02110-1301 USA
> + *
> + */
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c/ami305.h>
> +#include <linux/input-polldev.h>
> +
> +#define DRV_NAME "ami305"
> +
> +/*
> + * 16-bit registers are little-endian. LSB is at the address defined below
> + * and MSB is at the next higher address.
> + */
> +#define AMI305_SELFTEST		0x0C
> +#define AMI305_INFO		0x0D
> +#define AMI305_WHOAMI		0x0F
> +#define AMI305_DATA_X		0x10
> +#define AMI305_DATA_Y		0x12
> +#define AMI305_DATA_Z		0x14
> +#define AMI305_INT_SRC		0x16
> +#define AMI305_STATUS		0x18
> +#define AMI305_INT_CLEAR	0x1A
> +#define AMI305_CTRL1		0x1B
> +#define AMI305_CTRL2		0x1C
> +#define AMI305_CTRL3		0x1D
> +#define AMI305_INT_CTRL		0x1E
> +#define AMI305_OFFSET_X		0x20
> +#define AMI305_OFFSET_Y		0x22
> +#define AMI305_OFFSET_Z		0x24
> +#define AMI305_INT_THRES	0x26  /* absolute any axis value threshold */
> +#define AMI305_PRESET		0x30
> +#define AMI305_TEMP		0x31
> +
> +#define AMI305_SELFTEST_IDLE	0x55
> +#define AMI305_SELFTEST_OK	0xAA
> +
> +#define AMI305_WHOAMI_VALUE_AMI305 0x47
> +#define AMI305_WHOAMI_VALUE_AK8974 0x48
> +
> +#define AMI305_INT_X_HIGH	0x80  /* Axis over +threshold  */
> +#define AMI305_INT_Y_HIGH	0x40
> +#define AMI305_INT_Z_HIGH	0x20
> +#define AMI305_INT_X_LOW	0x10  /* Axis below -threshold	*/
> +#define AMI305_INT_Y_LOW	0x08
> +#define AMI305_INT_Z_LOW	0x04
> +#define AMI305_INT_RANGE	0x02  /* Range overflow (any axis)   */
> +
> +#define AMI305_STATUS_DRDY	0x40  /* Data ready	    */
> +#define AMI305_STATUS_OVERRUN	0x20  /* Data overrun	    */
> +#define AMI305_STATUS_INT	0x10  /* Interrupt occurred */
> +
> +#define AMI305_CTRL1_POWER	0x80  /* 0 = standby; 1 = active */
> +#define AMI305_CTRL1_RATE	0x10  /* 0 = 10 Hz;   1 = 20 Hz	 */
> +#define AMI305_CTRL1_FORCE_EN	0x02  /* 0 = normal;  1 = force	 */
> +#define AMI305_CTRL1_MODE2	0x01  /* 0 */
> +
> +#define AMI305_CTRL2_INT_EN	0x10  /* 1 = enable interrupts	      */
> +#define AMI305_CTRL2_DRDY_EN	0x08  /* 1 = enable data ready signal */
> +#define AMI305_CTRL2_DRDY_POL	0x04  /* 1 = data ready active high   */
> +
> +#define AMI305_CTRL3_RESET	0x80  /* Software reset		  */
> +#define AMI305_CTRL3_FORCE	0x40  /* Start forced measurement */
> +#define AMI305_CTRL3_SELFTEST	0x10  /* Set selftest register	  */
> +
> +#define AMI305_INT_CTRL_XEN	0x80  /* Enable interrupt for this axis */
> +#define AMI305_INT_CTRL_YEN	0x40
> +#define AMI305_INT_CTRL_ZEN	0x20
> +#define AMI305_INT_CTRL_XYZEN	0xE0
> +#define AMI305_INT_CTRL_POL	0x08  /* 0 = active low; 1 = active high     */
> +#define AMI305_INT_CTRL_PULSE	0x02  /* 0 = latched;	 1 = pulse (50 usec) */
> +
> +#define AMI305_MAX_RANGE	2048
> +#define AMI305_THRESHOLD_MAX	(AMI305_MAX_RANGE - 1)
> +
> +#define AMI305_POLL_INTERVAL	100   /* ms */
> +#define AMI305_ACTIVATE_DELAY	1     /* ms */
> +#define AMI305_DEFAULT_FUZZ	3     /* input noise filtering */
> +#define AMI305_MEAS_DELAY	6     /* one measurement in ms */
> +#define AMI305_SELFTEST_DELAY	1     /* ms. Spec says 200us min */
> +#define AMI305_RESET_DELAY	5     /* ms */
> +
> +#define AMI305_PWR_ON		1
> +#define AMI305_PWR_OFF		0
> +
> +#define AMI305_MAX_TRY		2
> +
> +struct ami305_chip {
> +	struct mutex		lock;	/* Serialize access to chip */
> +	struct mutex		users_lock;
> +	struct i2c_client	*client;
> +	struct input_polled_dev *idev;	   /* input device */
> +
> +	int			max_range;
> +	int			users;
> +	int			fuzz;
> +
> +	s16			x, y, z; /* Latest measurements */
> +	s8			axis_x;
> +	s8			axis_y;
> +	s8			axis_z;
> +};
> +
> +static int ami305_write(struct ami305_chip *chip, u8 reg, u8 data)
> +{
> +	return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(chip->client, reg, data);
> +}
> +
> +static int ami305_read(struct ami305_chip *chip, u8 reg)
> +{
> +	return i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(chip->client, reg);
> +}
Do the two functions above add anything? Why not call them directly in code.
This sort of abstraction is only useful if the device has multiple bus types.

> +
> +static int ami305_read_block(struct ami305_chip *chip, u8 reg,
> +			     u8 *data, u8 length)
> +{
> +	s32 result;
> +	result = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(chip->client,
> +				reg, length, data);
> +	return result;
> +}
If you are going to have this one collapse into a single line.

> +static int ami305_power(struct ami305_chip *chip, int poweron)
> +{
> +	int r, v;
> +
> +	v = poweron ? AMI305_CTRL1_POWER : 0;
> +	v = v | AMI305_CTRL1_FORCE_EN;
> +	r = ami305_write(chip, AMI305_CTRL1, v);
> +	if (r < 0)
> +		return r;
> +
> +	if (poweron)
> +		msleep(AMI305_ACTIVATE_DELAY);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ami305_start_measurement(struct ami305_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	int ctrl3;
> +	int ret = 0;
Don't need to set this to zero.

> +
> +	ctrl3 = ami305_read(chip, AMI305_CTRL3);
> +	if (ctrl3 < 0)
> +		return ctrl3;
> +
> +	ret = ami305_write(chip, AMI305_CTRL3, ctrl3 | AMI305_CTRL3_FORCE);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int ami305_reset(struct ami305_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	int r = 0;
Don't set to 0

> +
> +	/* Power on to get register access */
> +	r = ami305_power(chip, AMI305_PWR_ON);
> +	if (r < 0)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	r = ami305_write(chip, AMI305_CTRL3, AMI305_CTRL3_RESET);
> +	if (r < 0)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	msleep(AMI305_RESET_DELAY);
> +fail:
> +	return r;
> +}
> +
> +static int ami305_add_users(struct ami305_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	int r = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&chip->users_lock);
> +
> +	if (chip->users == 0) {
> +		r = ami305_power(chip, AMI305_PWR_ON);
> +		if (r < 0)
> +			goto fail;
> +	}
> +	chip->users++;
> +fail:
> +	mutex_unlock(&chip->users_lock);
> +	return r;
> +}
> +
> +static int ami305_remove_users(struct ami305_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	int r = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&chip->users_lock);
> +
> +	if (chip->users != 0)
> +		chip->users--;
> +
> +	if (chip->users == 0) {
> +		r = ami305_power(chip, AMI305_PWR_OFF);
> +		if (r < 0)
> +			goto fail;
> +	}
> +fail:
> +	mutex_unlock(&chip->users_lock);
> +	return r;
> +}
> +
> +static int ami305_configure(struct ami305_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +
> +	ami305_reset(chip);
> +
> +	ami305_add_users(chip);
> +
> +	err = ami305_write(chip, AMI305_CTRL2, AMI305_CTRL2_DRDY_EN);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	err = ami305_write(chip, AMI305_CTRL3, 0);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	err = ami305_write(chip, AMI305_INT_CTRL, AMI305_INT_CTRL_POL);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	err = ami305_write(chip, AMI305_PRESET, 0);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +fail:
> +	ami305_remove_users(chip);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}

Comment on this would be good. It is non obvious to casual reader.
> +static int ami305_get_axis(s8 axis, s16 hw_values[3])
> +{
> +	if (axis > 0)
> +		return hw_values[axis - 1];
> +	else
> +		return -hw_values[-axis - 1];
> +}
> +
> +static int ami305_read_values(struct ami305_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	s16 hw_values[3];
> +	int i;
> +
> +	ami305_start_measurement(chip);

Is the failure to read condition below common?  Nasty to handle
if so and I guess this might be the best option.  Otherwise, I'd
go with
> +	i = AMI305_MAX_TRY;
> +	do {
> +		msleep(AMI305_MEAS_DELAY);
> +		if (ami305_read(chip, AMI305_STATUS) & AMI305_STATUS_DRDY)
> +			break;
> +		i--;
> +	} while (i > 0);
while (i) will do just as well.

> +
> +	if (i == 0)
> +		return -ENODEV;
Not convinced that's the right error code.  Sure this indicates a failure
not that the device isn't there.

> +
> +	/* X, Y, Z are in conscutive addresses. 2 * 3 bytes */
> +	ami305_read_block(chip, AMI305_DATA_X, (u8 *)hw_values, 6);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
> +		hw_values[i] = le16_to_cpu(hw_values[i]);
> +
> +	chip->x = ami305_get_axis(chip->axis_x, hw_values);
> +	chip->y = ami305_get_axis(chip->axis_y, hw_values);
> +	chip->z = ami305_get_axis(chip->axis_z, hw_values);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ami305_selftest(struct ami305_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	int r;
> +	int success = 0;
> +
> +	ami305_add_users(chip);
> +
> +	r = ami305_read(chip, AMI305_SELFTEST);
> +	if (r != AMI305_SELFTEST_IDLE)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	r = ami305_read(chip, AMI305_CTRL3);
> +	if (r < 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	r = ami305_write(chip, AMI305_CTRL3, r | AMI305_CTRL3_SELFTEST);
> +	if (r < 0)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	msleep(AMI305_SELFTEST_DELAY);
> +
> +	r = ami305_read(chip, AMI305_SELFTEST);
> +	if (r != AMI305_SELFTEST_OK)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	r = ami305_read(chip, AMI305_SELFTEST);
> +	if (r == AMI305_SELFTEST_IDLE)
> +		success = 1;
> +
> + out:
> +	ami305_remove_users(chip);
> +
> +	return success;
> +}
> +
> +static void ami305_set_input_params(struct ami305_chip *chip, int fuzz)
> +{
> +	struct input_dev *input_dev = chip->idev->input;
> +	int range;
> +
> +	range = chip->max_range;
Roll that into the line above.

> +	input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_X, -range, range, fuzz, 0);
> +	input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_Y, -range, range, fuzz, 0);
> +	input_set_abs_params(input_dev, ABS_Z, -range, range, fuzz, 0);
> +	chip->fuzz = fuzz;
> +}
> +/*
> + * SYSFS interface
> + */
> +
> +static ssize_t ami305_show_selftest(struct device *dev,
> +				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	char *status;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> +	status = ami305_selftest(chip) ? "OK" : "FAIL";
Nasty, and probably better to just use 1 and 0
> +	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", status);
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(selftest, S_IRUGO, ami305_show_selftest, NULL);
> +
> +static ssize_t ami305_show_active(struct device *dev,
> +				    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int status;
> +
> +	/* Read from the chip to reflect real state of the HW */
> +	status = ami305_read(chip, AMI305_CTRL1) & AMI305_CTRL1_POWER;
Again, 1 and 0 are more common.
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", status ? "ON" : "OFF");
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(active, S_IRUGO, ami305_show_active, NULL);
> +
> +static ssize_t ami305_get_fuzz(struct device *dev,
> +				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", chip->fuzz);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t ami305_set_fuzz(struct device *dev,
> +			       struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
> +			       size_t count)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	unsigned long fuzz;
> +
> +	if (strict_strtoul(buf, 0, &fuzz))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (fuzz > AMI305_MAX_RANGE)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ami305_set_input_params(chip, fuzz);
> +
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(fuzz, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, ami305_get_fuzz,
> +					    ami305_set_fuzz);
> +
> +static struct attribute *sysfs_attrs[] = {
> +	&dev_attr_selftest.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_active.attr,
> +	&dev_attr_fuzz.attr,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
> +static struct attribute_group ami305_attribute_group = {
> +	.attrs = sysfs_attrs
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Polled input device interface
> + */
> +
> +static void ami305_poll(struct input_polled_dev *pidev)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = pidev->private;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> +
> +	ami305_read_values(chip);
> +	input_report_abs(pidev->input, ABS_X, chip->x);
> +	input_report_abs(pidev->input, ABS_Y, chip->y);
> +	input_report_abs(pidev->input, ABS_Z, chip->z);
> +	input_sync(pidev->input);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void ami305_open(struct input_polled_dev *pidev)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = pidev->private;
> +	ami305_add_users(chip);
> +	ami305_poll(pidev);
> +}
> +
> +static void ami305_close(struct input_polled_dev *pidev)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = pidev->private;
> +	ami305_remove_users(chip);
> +}
> +
> +int ami305_inputdev_enable(struct ami305_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	struct input_dev *input_dev;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (chip->idev)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	chip->idev = input_allocate_polled_device();
> +	if (!chip->idev)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	chip->idev->private	  = chip;
> +	chip->idev->poll	  = ami305_poll;
> +	chip->idev->close	  = ami305_close;
> +	chip->idev->open	  = ami305_open;
> +	chip->idev->poll_interval = AMI305_POLL_INTERVAL;
> +
> +	input_dev	      = chip->idev->input;
> +	input_dev->name	      = "AMI305 / AK8974 Magnetometer";
> +	input_dev->phys	      = DRV_NAME "/input0";
> +	input_dev->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
> +	input_dev->id.vendor  = 0;
> +	input_dev->dev.parent = &chip->client->dev;
> +
> +	set_bit(EV_ABS, input_dev->evbit);
> +	ami305_set_input_params(chip, AMI305_DEFAULT_FUZZ);
> +
> +	err = input_register_polled_device(chip->idev);
> +	if (err) {
> +		input_free_polled_device(chip->idev);
> +		chip->idev = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devinit ami305_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> +				const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip;
> +	struct ami305_platform_data *pdata;
> +	int err = 0;
> +	int whoami;
> +	int x, y, z;
> +
> +	chip = kzalloc(sizeof *chip, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!chip)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, chip);
> +	chip->client  = client;
> +
> +	pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
> +
> +	x = AMI305_DEV_X;
> +	y = AMI305_DEV_Y;
> +	z = AMI305_DEV_Z;
> +
> +	if (pdata) {
> +		/* Remap axes */
> +		x = pdata->axis_x ? pdata->axis_x : x;
> +		y = pdata->axis_y ? pdata->axis_y : y;
> +		z = pdata->axis_z ? pdata->axis_z : z;
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((abs(x) > 3) | (abs(y) > 3) | (abs(z) > 3)) {
> +		dev_err(&client->dev, "Incorrect platform data\n");
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto fail1;
> +	}
> +
> +	chip->axis_x = x;
> +	chip->axis_y = y;
> +	chip->axis_z = z;
> +
> +	chip->max_range = AMI305_MAX_RANGE;
> +
> +	mutex_init(&chip->lock);
> +	mutex_init(&chip->users_lock);
> +
> +	whoami = ami305_read(chip, AMI305_WHOAMI);
> +	if (whoami < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&client->dev, "device not found\n");
> +		err = -ENODEV;
> +		goto fail1;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (whoami == AMI305_WHOAMI_VALUE_AMI305) {
> +		dev_dbg(&client->dev, "device is AMI305, ok\n");
> +	} else if (whoami == AMI305_WHOAMI_VALUE_AK8974) {
> +		dev_dbg(&client->dev, "device is AK8974, ok\n");
> +	} else {
> +		dev_err(&client->dev, "device is neither AMI305 nor AK8974\n");
> +		err = -ENODEV;
> +		goto fail1;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = ami305_configure(chip);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto fail1;
> +
> +	err = ami305_inputdev_enable(chip);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(&client->dev, "Cannot setup input device\n");
> +		goto fail1;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = sysfs_create_group(&chip->client->dev.kobj,
> +				&ami305_attribute_group);
> +	if (err)
> +		dev_err(&client->dev, "Sysfs registration failed\n");
> +
> +	return err;
> +fail1:
> +	kfree(chip);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devexit ami305_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> +	sysfs_remove_group(&chip->client->dev.kobj,
> +			&ami305_attribute_group);
> +	input_unregister_polled_device(chip->idev);
> +	input_free_polled_device(chip->idev);
> +	kfree(chip);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#if CONFIG_PM
> +static int ami305_suspend(struct i2c_client *client, pm_message_t mesg)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	ami305_power(chip, AMI305_PWR_OFF);
This returns an error code under some conditions, should it not be passed on?
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ami305_resume(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	ami305_power(chip, AMI305_PWR_ON);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ami305_shutdown(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct ami305_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	ami305_power(chip, AMI305_PWR_OFF);
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +#define ami305_suspend NULL
> +#define ami305_shutdown NULL
> +#define ami305_resume NULL
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id ami305_id[] = {
> +	{DRV_NAME, 0 },
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ami305_id);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver ami305_driver = {
> +	.driver	 = {
> +		.name	= DRV_NAME,
> +		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
> +	},
> +	.suspend = ami305_suspend,
> +	.shutdown = ami305_shutdown,
> +	.resume = ami305_resume,
> +	.probe	= ami305_probe,
> +	.remove = __devexit_p(ami305_remove),
> +	.id_table = ami305_id,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init ami305_init(void)
> +{
> +	return i2c_add_driver(&ami305_driver);
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit ami305_exit(void)
> +{
> +	i2c_del_driver(&ami305_driver);
> +}
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AMI305 3-axis magnetometer driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Samu Onkalo, Nokia Corporation");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("i2c:" DRV_NAME);
> +
> +module_init(ami305_init);
> +module_exit(ami305_exit);
> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c/ami305.h b/include/linux/i2c/ami305.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6ca1931
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c/ami305.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +/*
> + * Configuration for AMI305 (and AK8974) magnetometer driver.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __LINUX_I2C_AMI305_H
> +#define __LINUX_I2C_AMI305_H
> +
> +#define AMI305_NO_MAP		  0
> +#define AMI305_DEV_X		  1
> +#define AMI305_DEV_Y		  2
> +#define AMI305_DEV_Z		  3
> +#define AMI305_INV_DEV_X	 -1
> +#define AMI305_INV_DEV_Y	 -2
> +#define AMI305_INV_DEV_Z	 -3
> +
> +struct ami305_platform_data {
> +	s8 axis_x;
> +	s8 axis_y;
> +	s8 axis_z;
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* __LINUX_I2C_AMI305_H */

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ