[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1258035358.4039.374.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:15:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Spencer Candland <spencer@...ehost.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix granularity of task_u/stime(), v2
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 13:33 +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Originally task_s/utime() were designed to return clock_t but later
> changed to return cputime_t by following commit:
>
> commit efe567fc8281661524ffa75477a7c4ca9b466c63
> Author: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> Date: Thu Aug 23 15:18:02 2007 +0200
>
> It only changed the type of return value, but not the implementation.
> As the result the granularity of task_s/utime() is still that of
> clock_t, not that of cputime_t.
>
> So using task_s/utime() in __exit_signal() makes values accumulated
> to the signal struct to be rounded and coarse grained.
>
> This patch removes casts to clock_t in task_u/stime(), to keep
> granularity of cputime_t over the calculation.
>
> v2:
> Use div_u64() to avoid error "undefined reference to `__udivdi3`"
> on some 32bit systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>
/me hates all the cputime_t and clock_t mess.. but I guess the patch is
good.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists