[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091112143205.GA5237@nowhere>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:32:10 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 v6] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints
layer on top of perf events
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 06:24:46PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > + * care about the messed up debug address registers. But if
> > + * we have some of them active, restore the old state.
> > + */
> > + if (__get_cpu_var(dr7) & DR_GLOBAL_ENABLE_MASK)
>
> Looks good, just a minor remark: Would be cleaner to wrap this into an
> inline function, say hw_breakpoint_active(), to abstract the precise
> condition away from KVM.
Done :)
> > + hw_breakpoint_restore();
> >
> > set_bit(KVM_REQ_KICK, &vcpu->requests);
> > local_irq_enable();
>
> Will see that I can give your series a try the next days, probably
> debugging qemu-kvm while running a guest that uses breakpoints. But I
> don't expect surprises.
>
> Jan
Thanks!
You can find it at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git
tracing/hw-breakpoints
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists