[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091112145314.GA24682@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:53:14 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] security/selinux: decrement sizeof size in strncmp
Quoting James Morris (jmorris@...ei.org):
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> >
> > As observed by Joe Perches, sizeof of a constant string includes the
> > trailing 0. If what is wanted is to check the initial characters of
> > another string, this trailing 0 should not be taken into account. If an
> > exact match is wanted, strcmp should be used instead.
>
> > --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> > +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> > @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int sb_finish_set_opts(struct sup
> > sbsec->flags &= ~SE_SBLABELSUPP;
> >
> > /* Special handling for sysfs. Is genfs but also has setxattr handler*/
> > - if (strncmp(sb->s_type->name, "sysfs", sizeof("sysfs")) == 0)
> > + if (strncmp(sb->s_type->name, "sysfs", sizeof("sysfs") - 1) == 0)
> > sbsec->flags |= SE_SBLABELSUPP;
>
> Shouldn't this be a simple strcmp() ?
Yes I think so.
Julia seems to be arguing that if a module introduces a new fs with
name 'sysfs_foo' then this check should match that fs too (since
for sysfs, sb->s_type->name = "sysfs" which also has a trailing \0,
so for the regular sysfs her patch makes no practical difference).
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists