linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] security/selinux: decrement sizeof size in strncmp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AFC3620.2020809@schaufler-ca.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:21:52 -0800
From:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
CC:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] security/selinux: decrement sizeof size in strncmp

Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
>   
>> Quoting James Morris (jmorris@...ei.org):
>>     
>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>>>>
>>>> As observed by Joe Perches, sizeof of a constant string includes the
>>>> trailing 0.  If what is wanted is to check the initial characters of
>>>> another string, this trailing 0 should not be taken into account.  If an
>>>> exact match is wanted, strcmp should be used instead.
>>>>         
>>>> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
>>>> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
>>>> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int sb_finish_set_opts(struct sup
>>>>  		sbsec->flags &= ~SE_SBLABELSUPP;
>>>>  
>>>>  	/* Special handling for sysfs. Is genfs but also has setxattr handler*/
>>>> -	if (strncmp(sb->s_type->name, "sysfs", sizeof("sysfs")) == 0)
>>>> +	if (strncmp(sb->s_type->name, "sysfs", sizeof("sysfs") - 1) == 0)
>>>>  		sbsec->flags |= SE_SBLABELSUPP;
>>>>         
>>> Shouldn't this be a simple strcmp() ?
>>>       
>> Yes I think so.
>>
>> Julia seems to be arguing that if a module introduces a new fs with
>> name 'sysfs_foo' then this check should match that fs too (since
>> for sysfs, sb->s_type->name = "sysfs" which also has a trailing \0,
>> so for the regular sysfs her patch makes no practical difference).
>>     
>
> If strcmp is what is wanted, I can make a patch for that.
>   

I strongly suggest that this is not what is wanted.
    strcmp(x,y)
and
    strncmp(x,y,sizeof(y))

are functionally equivalent and strcmp has a bad reputation in
the security community because it is associated with potential
buffer overrun issues.

    strncmp(x,y,sizeof(y)-1)

is not the same and is more cluttered as well. This code
does not need to be changed. It does what it is intended
to do in a strait-forward manner.
> julia
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/