[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878web7kwf.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:44:32 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>,
"Anton D. Kachalov" <mouse@...c.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reading /dev/mem by dd
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br> writes:
>
> We should. Imaging /dev/mem is one of the oldest tricks in the book of the
> forensics people, they do it to live systems to help track down WTF happened
> to a compromised host. This kind of crap bites them hard.
It seems more like a case of hurting themselves.
>
> IMO: if you're going to provide /dev/mem, make it as safe as possible.
That would also make it useless for people who want to access MMIO using
/dev/mem. Which is a lot of programs.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists