linux-kernel - Re: Reading /dev/mem by dd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:44:32 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>,
	"Anton D. Kachalov" <mouse@...c.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reading /dev/mem by dd

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br> writes:
>
> We should.  Imaging /dev/mem is one of the oldest tricks in the book of the
> forensics people, they do it to live systems to help track down WTF happened
> to a compromised host.  This kind of crap bites them hard.

It seems more like a case of hurting themselves.

>
> IMO: if you're going to provide /dev/mem, make it as safe as possible.

That would also make it useless for people who want to access MMIO using
/dev/mem. Which is a lot of programs.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/