[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AFC4D31.2000101@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:00:17 +0100
From: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com>
CC: linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dwm2@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mpm@...enic.com,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] panic-note: Annotation from user space for panics
Sincerely, I don't understand why we should involve the kernel to gather
this kind of information when we can use other (user-space) tools, only
to have "all" in a single report maybe? I think it's a bit weak reason
to include this additional behavior in the kernel.
David VomLehn ha scritto:
> Allows annotation of panics to include platform information. It's no big
> deal to collect information, but way helpful when you are collecting
> failure reports from a eventual base of millions of systems deployed in
> other people's homes.
>
Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists