linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/7] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu INIT bootup messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AFC7C11.1090701@sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:20:17 -0800
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu INIT bootup messages

Hmm, yes I agree, too much cut and paste.  Will update. -thanks!

David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Mike Travis wrote:
> 
>> Limit the number of per cpu INIT messages when system is booting to
>> prevent clogging up the console output with repetitious messages.
>>
> 
> Needs a better changelog.  What did you do to effect that change?  It 
> looks like you're only emitting certain messages from the boot cpu.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
>> ---
>>  init/calibrate.c |   22 +++++++++++++---------
>>  kernel/cpu.c     |    5 ++---
>>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- linux.orig/init/calibrate.c
>> +++ linux/init/calibrate.c
>> @@ -123,23 +123,26 @@
>>  {
>>  	unsigned long ticks, loopbit;
>>  	int lps_precision = LPS_PREC;
>> +	bool boot_cpu = (smp_processor_id() == 0);
>>  
>>  	if (preset_lpj) {
>>  		loops_per_jiffy = preset_lpj;
>> -		printk(KERN_INFO
>> -			"Calibrating delay loop (skipped) preset value.. ");
>> -	} else if ((smp_processor_id() == 0) && lpj_fine) {
>> +		if (boot_cpu)
>> +			pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped) "
>> +				"preset value.. ");
> 
> Same comment as before about breaking printk strings into multiple lines 
> when not broken at '\n'.  All the other patches your series look good 
> after this, however.
> 
>> +	} else if ((boot_cpu) && lpj_fine) {
> 
> Parentheses around boot_cpu?
> 
>>  		loops_per_jiffy = lpj_fine;
>> -		printk(KERN_INFO
>> -			"Calibrating delay loop (skipped), "
>> +		pr_info("Calibrating delay loop (skipped), "
>>  			"value calculated using timer frequency.. ");
>>  	} else if ((loops_per_jiffy = calibrate_delay_direct()) != 0) {
>> -		printk(KERN_INFO
>> -			"Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. ");
>> +		if (boot_cpu)
>> +			pr_info("Calibrating delay using timer "
>> +				"specific routine.. ");
>>  	} else {
>>  		loops_per_jiffy = (1<<12);
>>  
>> -		printk(KERN_INFO "Calibrating delay loop... ");
>> +		if (boot_cpu)
>> +			pr_info("Calibrating delay loop... ");
>>  		while ((loops_per_jiffy <<= 1) != 0) {
>>  			/* wait for "start of" clock tick */
>>  			ticks = jiffies;
>> @@ -170,7 +173,8 @@
>>  				loops_per_jiffy &= ~loopbit;
>>  		}
>>  	}
>> -	printk(KERN_CONT "%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
>> +	if (boot_cpu)
>> +		pr_cont("%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
>>  			loops_per_jiffy/(500000/HZ),
>>  			(loops_per_jiffy/(5000/HZ)) % 100, loops_per_jiffy);
>>  }
>> --- linux.orig/kernel/cpu.c
>> +++ linux/kernel/cpu.c
>> @@ -392,10 +392,9 @@
>>  		if (cpu == first_cpu)
>>  			continue;
>>  		error = _cpu_down(cpu, 1);
>> -		if (!error) {
>> +		if (!error)
>>  			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, frozen_cpus);
>> -			printk("CPU%d is down\n", cpu);
>> -		} else {
>> +		else {
>>  			printk(KERN_ERR "Error taking CPU%d down: %d\n",
>>  				cpu, error);
>>  			break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/