[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0911130833220.5497@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:41:26 +1100 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] security/selinux: decrement sizeof size in strncmp
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> I strongly suggest that this is not what is wanted.
> strcmp(x,y)
> and
> strncmp(x,y,sizeof(y))
>
> are functionally equivalent and strcmp has a bad reputation in
> the security community because it is associated with potential
> buffer overrun issues.
Do you see potential for a buffer overrun in this case?
The strings being compared are "sysfs" and the name field of 'struct
file_system_type'. The kernel code elsewhere assumes the latter string to
be a valid zero-terminated string, and we should, too.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists