linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/19] OMAP: DSS2 v5 intro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:10:28 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...ia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"dedekind1@...il.com" <dedekind1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] OMAP: DSS2 v5 intro

Hi Tony,

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:42:09 -0800 Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:
>
> * Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...ia.com> [091111 01:43]:
> > On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 09:45 +0100, Valkeinen Tomi (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 13:40 +0100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > could you please kindly ask Stephen (CCed) to include the DSS2 tree into
> > > > linux-next, because you are going to merge it the next merge window, and
> > > > there does not seem to be any blocker for this.
> > > > 
> > > > Being in linux-next for a while is really important.
> > > 
> > > Stephen, would this be possible? DSS2 driver is rather big piece of
> > > code, even if it's quite isolated, so it would be nice to have it in
> > > linux-next.
> > > 
> > > What does it require from me? A git tree, obviously, but what should it
> > > be based on?
> > 
> > Ah, I just realized that DSS2 patches depend on patches from Tony's
> > tree. I guess I should base my tree on top of some Tony's tree that is
> > going to linux-next?
> 
> Or I can merge them into my for-next if that's OK with everybody. This
> merge cycle is a pain for omap as we've moved all the common headers from
> include/mach to include/plat.

If the DSS2 patches really are dependent on other stuff in the omap tree,
then this is probably the best plan.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped