[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AFBB72F.6070907@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:20:15 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: ykzhao <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make sure wakeup code is below 1M -v2
On 11/11/2009 11:14 PM, ykzhao wrote:
>
> In this patch the find_e820_area is used in the
> acpi_reserve_wakeup_memory, which is called after initializing the
> bootmem allocator.
> Can we still use the find_e820_area after the bootmem allocator is
> initialized?
Obviously not: the bootmem allocator now thinks it owns memory, and it
wouldn't know not to allocate something that is later claimed by
find_e820_area. Problem.
> It seems that the bootmem bitmap is also found by using the
> find_e820_area. But we don't update the reserved_early array any more.
> Maybe we will get the overlap address with the bootmem bitmap for the
> wakeup code.
Not just the bitmap, but any bootmem allocation could conflict...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists