[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091113095801.GA29977@in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:28:01 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: -next: Nov 12 - kernel BUG at kernel/sched.c:7359!
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:10:31PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 1f2e99d..62df61c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2377,6 +2377,9 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state,
> task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
>
How about this ?
again:
cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_WAKE, wake_flags);
if (!cpu_online(cpu))
cpu = cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask);
if (!cpu) {
set_task_affinity();
goto again;
}
> +
> if (cpu != orig_cpu) {
> local_irq_save(flags);
> rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
Will it help further narrow down the window ?
>
>
> Something I think Mike also tried and didn't deadlock for him..
>
> Sachin, Mike, could you try the above snippet and verify if it does
> indeed solve your respective issues?
>
> /me prays it does, because otherwise I'm fresh out of clue...
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists