[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091112210351.459994c2@mycelium.queued.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:03:51 -0500
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...labora.co.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:18:05 +0100
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > The Geode NX (which no one has mentioned yet) is an Athlon
> > > > derived chip.
> > >
> > > *As far as I know* K6 didn't have NOPL, whereas K7 does.
> >
> > Which would be mroe indication that the Geode LX may in fact be a K6
> > based CPU design. The Geode NX is very clearly an Athlon (K7) and
> > AMD has never even tried to hide that. They have never said what
> > the LX is based on, other than it isn't based on the GX
> > (fortunately, that thing was a buggy piece of crap).
>
> Interesting...geode gx being buggy? I know pentium was famous for the
> fdiv bug, but never heard of geode gx problems...
http://www.amd.com/files/connectivitysolutions/geode/geode_gx/31533E_gx_2.1_specupdate.pdf
1.4 is my favorite. The branch prediction logic can send the
instruction pointer off to la-la land.
While at olpc, we had a sad discussion about what the *real* impact of
the workaround was...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists