[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <193b0f820911130646g5e2b88d2t6a1cf6b483b5266e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:46:26 -0200
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: perf stat output
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 06:07, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 20:03 -0200, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Some questions about perf stat output. See example:
>>
>>
>> lucas@...-linux:~/programming/testprograms> perf stat -e
>> L1-dcache-loads -e L1-dcache-load-misses -- make -j
>> gcc test_schedchanges.c -o test_schedchanges
>> gcc -pthread test_taskaff1.c -o test_taskaff1
>> gcc -pthread test_taskaff2.c -o test_taskaff2
>> gcc -pthread test_taskaff3.c -o test_taskaff3
>>
>> Performance counter stats for 'make -j':
>>
>> 161384667 L1-dcache-loads # 0.000 M/sec
>> 24853791 L1-dcache-load-misses # 0.000 M/sec
>>
>> 0.066893389 seconds time elapsed
>>
>> Why do we have both L1-dcache-loads and L1-dcache-load-misses with
>> 0.000 M/sec? Also, why do we have 0 M/s when running "perf stat -a -e
>> cache-misses -e cache-references" but values different than 0 when
>> running "perf stat -a" without selecting the events?
>
> No idea, you'd have to look at the code computing this M/sec stuff. I
> think Ingo wrote that, so he might have an idea.
But should it be, for example, L1-dcache-loads / seconds time elapsed,
or does it have another meaning?
Lucas De Marchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists