[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87my2qwff8.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:35:55 +0100
From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
yakui.zhao@...el.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] intermittent suspend problem again
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
> Yes, echo "core" to /sys/power/pm_test before executing s2disk.
It snapshots the system and returns, producing the same console output
as s2ram (is this the expected behaviour?) I ran this several times in
a loop, and experienced no problems at all. Maybe it depends on the
amount of memory used... I saw a freeze saying "99% done" (ie. not
100%), btw. Are other pm_test values meaningful with s2disk? Is this
handled explicitly in s2disk, or does simply the kernel act as if it was
resumed instead of providing the system image after SNAPSHOT_CREATE_IMAGE?
> On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> I already did the test for STR (see
>> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22126#c3), but will redo
>> with the current kernel tonight.
>
> OK, thanks.
No change on this front, FWIW. But rc7 is out now, I'll test again.
--
Thanks,
Feri.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists