linux-kernel - Re: [AppArmor #3 0/12] AppArmor security module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:58:18 -0800
From:	John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor #3 0/12] AppArmor security module

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:12:53 -0800
> John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com> wrote:
> 
>> This is the newest version of the AppArmor security module it has been
>> rewritten to use the security_path hooks instead of the previous vfs
>> approach.  The current implementation is aimed at being as semantically
>> close to previous versions of AppArmor as possible while using the
>> existing LSM infrastructure.
> 
> Does it fix the problem reported as the #1 failure on kernel oops:
> 
> Oops 718946 first showed up in kernel version 2.6.31-14-generic
> Oops 718946 last showed up in version 2.6.31-13-generic
> 2.6.31 -- 512

yes, and several others oops as well.  I have also identified a couple other
oops that will have fixes in push #4.

thanks
john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/