[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091114025202.3DAB.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:00:59 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm: mlocking in try_to_unmap_one
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:26:14PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Probably we can remove VM_NONLINEAR perfectly. I've never seen real user of it.
>
> Do you mean as a whole or in the mlock logic? databases are using
> remap_file_pages on 32bit archs to avoid generating zillon of vmas on
> tmpfs scattered mappings. On 64bits it could only be useful to some
> emulators but with real shadow paging and nonlinear rmap already
> created on shadow pagetables, it looks pretty useless on 64bit archs
> to me.
Hehe, you point out kosaki is stupid and knoledgeless.
thanks correct me.
Probaby we have to maintain VM_NONLINEAR for one or two year. two years
later, nobody use database on 32bit machine.
(low-end DB might be use on 32bit, but that's ok. it doesn't use VM_NONLINEAR)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists