[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091113211104.GA27945@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:11:04 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, joerg.roedel@....com, mingo@...e.hu,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] bootmem: add free_bootmem_late
* Pekka Enberg (penberg@...helsinki.fi) wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> >> for (cursor = start; cursor < end; cursor += BITS_PER_LONG) {
> >> - unsigned long idx, vec;
> >> + unsigned long vec;
> >>
> >> - idx = cursor - start;
> >> - vec = ~map[idx / BITS_PER_LONG];
> >> + if (map) {
> >> + unsigned long idx = cursor - start;
> >> + vec = ~map[idx / BITS_PER_LONG];
> >> + } else {
> >> + if (end - cursor >= BITS_PER_LONG)
> >> + vec = ~0UL;
> >
> > Why do we need the above?
>
> OK, I figured that out. I'm not sure why you want to play tricks with
> "vec" when you could just add a new helper that calls
> __free_pages_bootmem() for the full contiguous page range.
I did it this way since it's simple enough and allows for high-order
frees (these will nearly all be high-order) and keeps the same core
code exercised in each path. You can't do a higher order free
w/ __free_pages_bootmem() w/out conforming to its requirements.
I don't care either way.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists