| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <6f5aac130911122233r57936a8ek920208622019737a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:33:25 -0800 From: saurabh chokshi <sdchokshi@...il.com> To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: i2c_detect Vs i2c_probe Hello , I am emailing with reference to the thread on linux kernel. http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0304.0/0495.html I am currently writing i2c driver for Power Supply. I also have the same query. Whenever I insert the module, and if the i2c_detect detects the device with address mentioned in normal_i2c array, then mydriver_detect gets called. However, I was just wondering that when i2c_probe gets called. You can explicitly call i2c_probe and pass i2c_attach function pointer. Could you please share your knowledge with me? Best Regards, --------------------------------------- Saurabh D Chokshi Master of Science - Computer Science University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists