[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091113081722.GA14009@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:17:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Measuring term of acquiring spinlock
* Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Measuring term of acquiring spinlock
> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:39:09 +0100
>
> >
> > * Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:
> >
> > > * Description
> > >
> > > This patch makes the file spinlock_stats on top of the debugfs.
> > > When user reads this file, some statistical data related to
> > > spinlocks are printed.
> >
> > hm, are you aware of the lockstat tracepoints? They do something
> > like this - and it utilizes perf events to report these events. See
> > include/trace/events/lockdep.h. Needs CONFIG_LOCK_STAT enabled.
> >
>
> Wow, I didn't know that. I'll try it.
Btw., i think we should rename that tracepoint category from 'lockdep'
to 'lock'. It's possible to enable them without CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING,
and they arent high-overhead in that case.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists