[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440911131848o2cccb056x32a819634c6855d9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:48:58 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/debug] x86: Minimise printk spew from per-vendor init
code
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:03:44PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
> > > @@ -656,6 +656,7 @@ static void __init early_identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > >
> > > void __init early_cpu_init(void)
> > > {
> > > +#ifdef PROCESSOR_SELECT
> > > const struct cpu_dev *const *cdev;
> > > int count = 0;
> > >
> > > @@ -676,7 +677,7 @@ void __init early_cpu_init(void)
> > > cpudev->c_ident[j]);
> > > }
> > > }
> > > -
> > > +#endif
> > > early_identify_cpu(&boot_cpu_data);
> > > }
> >
> > NACK.
> >
> > the function is initializing cpu_devs array.
>
> Ugh, I don't know how I missed that. I also seem to have boot tested the wrong kernel.
> Back to the drawing board.
>
use two loop instead?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists