lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:48:11 -0800 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: David Wagner <daw-news@...erner.cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] security/selinux: decrement sizeof size in strncmp On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 03:44 +0000, David Wagner wrote: > I personally don't find > strncmp(foo, "constant", sizeof("constant")) // first snippet > to be more readable, auditable, or obviously correct than > strcmp(foo, "constant"). // second snippet > Is there a technical basis for arguing that the first > snippet is better than the second snippet? I don't think there is. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists