[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94a0d4530911150927l3224e815ha6ff17aab6f19251@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:27:22 +0200
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi: fix trivial warning
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 22:28 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> That doesn't seem too positive. Or at least there's no indication that
>> somebody will pick it up.
>
> I'd re-submit with a better description of the patch. You should always
> try to describe what your doing as accurately as possible so the
> maintainer doesn't have to work very hard to know what your doing.
There's nothing to add. It's a patch to cleanup the coding style, that's it.
> That
> particular patch just has a one liner description that wasn't very
> informative .. Either that or re-submit your series without that patch
> if you don't have confidence in it.
All of my patches have been picked up, except the ones for ACPI. I
haven't received a single comment from them, which would explain the
current state of the code.
If somebody raised the hand and said; I'll merge this, please resend,
I'd do that, otherwise I think it's a waste of time.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists