linux-kernel - [RFC][PATCH] sched_wait_block: wait for blocked threads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:04:18 +0100
From:	Stijn Devriendt <highguy@...il.com>
To:	mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] sched_wait_block: wait for blocked threads

Hi Ingo, Peter, all,

The attached patch is a prototype for a new system call which
allows threads to wait for other threads being blocked.

Its main use is to allow threading libraries to resume
executing more CPU-bound work when one of its threads is
blocked while not having to over-allocating threads in a 
normal situation. 

Benefit over asynchronous I/O is that a threadpool
thread that performs asynchronous I/O might not have
work enough in one item to keep the CPU busy during the
whole asynchronous operation and that not all operations
are async capable.
Giving control back to the library through a thread
waiting for the blocked one allows new workitems to be
executed as long as the former is blocked.

Code performing this wait could look like:
  pid_t parent = ...;
  while (waitpid(parent, NULL, WNOHANG) != 0)
  {
    if (sched_wait_block(parent, NULL) == 0)
		{
      // do work, possibly notify threadpool manager
			// to start another thread blocked on this one
			// first
		}
  }

Any feedback on the concept is much appreciated.

Regards,
	Stijn Devriendt

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/