linux-kernel - curious about alleged "compatibility" bits for lm-sensors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911150310550.8158@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:12:59 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: curious about alleged "compatibility" bits for lm-sensors


  from drivers/i2c/Kconfig:

config I2C_COMPAT
        boolean "Enable compatibility bits for old user-space"
        default y
        help
          Say Y here if you intend to run lm-sensors 3.1.1 or older, or any
          other user-space package which expects i2c adapters to be class
          devices. If you don't know, say Y.

  as i read it, lm-sensors 3.1.1 *is* the current version, as you can
read here:

  http://lm-sensors.org/wiki/Download

so how does that represent "old user-space"?  i'm just curious.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/