[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911161506540.24119@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:19:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
cc: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@...il.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@...glemail.com>,
Patrik Kluba <kpajko79@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
"Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhangfx@...ote.com, zhouqg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] ftrace for MIPS
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 02:30:31PM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote:
>
> Time to talk about how to get the whole thing merged.
>
> I'm reasonably happy with the arch part of the patchset. There are two
> remaining issues in the arch part - cache flushing will not work as is on
> a SMP system and the whole code patching is going to fail if the kernel
> text is replicated with CONFIG_REPLICATE_KTEXT which is an IP27-only option.
>
> I suggest we should go ahready and just disallow dynamic ftrace on on
> these problematic configurations for now and deal with them later, so
> something like
>
> select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE if !SMP && !REPLICATE_KTEXT
Makes sense.
> This leaves the non-arch bits to merge; patches which touch code outside
> of arch/mips are:
I'm going to comment on the patches.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists