[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B01A8DB.6090002@bluehost.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:32:43 -0700
From: Spencer Candland <spencer@...ehost.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix granularity of task_u/stime(), v2
Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Ok, I'm going to post this.
>
> Spencer,
>
> seems you have more test cases for utime decreasing issues,
> could you send links to me ? Somehow I could not find them
> by my own. Particularly test case used in development this commit
> is interested:
>
> commit 49048622eae698e5c4ae61f7e71200f265ccc529
> Author: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Fri Sep 5 18:12:23 2008 +0200
> sched: fix process time monotonicity
I had originally noticed that in a production web server, so my test
case was designed to mirror what I was seeing there, which was just
running apache with worker mpm, and running a simple apache bench while
watching the utime/stime of the apache children. Unfortunately that
method was not terribly reliable at reproducing the issue, which is why
I felt it necessary to try to come up with a better test case this time
around.
- Spencer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists