[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911162223.15897.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:23:15 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] PM: Add flag for devices capable of generating run-time wake-up events
Am Montag, 16. November 2009 22:00:49 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > What if the user wants to override the kernel's setting? Should there
> > > be a sysfs attribute controlling the flag?
> >
> >
> > I have no plans for adding anything like that.
>
> So if the kernel makes a mistake here, the user won't be able to
> correct it.
If the kernel cannot tell whether a device can generate a request for
remote wakeup, how would it know the enable such requests?
Now we might come to a device that has a flatly wrong firmware,
but has that really been encountered in the wild?
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists