[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091116215052.GK5653@lenovo>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:50:52 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration
bootup messages
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 01:46:07PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/16/2009 01:43 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >
> > It seems we have one
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:125:unsigned int boot_cpu_id __read_mostly;
> >
> > -- Cyrill
>
> We probably should make it an inline function so that if other arches
> want to define it to be a constant or some other kind of special thing
> they can.
>
> -hpa
>
IA-64 and SPARC already has this variable. But boot_cpu_id() as an
inline function seem to be more natural/portable ineed.
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists