[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091117124715.GA22834@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:47:15 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Kill PF_MEMALLOC abuse
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:24:24PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:24:42PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > if xfsbufd doesn't only write out dirty data but also drop page,
> > > I agree you.
> >
> > It then drops the reference to the buffer which drops references to the
> > pages, which often are the last references, yes.
>
> I though it is not typical case. Am I wrong?
> if so, I'm sorry. I'm not XFS expert.
I think in the typical case it's the last reference. The are two
reasons why it might not be:
- we're on a filesystem with block size < page size in which case two
buffers can share a page and we'd need to write out and release both
buffers to free the page
- someone else might have a reference on the buffer. Offhand I can't
remember a place where we do this for delayed write buffers (which
is what xfsbufd writes out) as it would be a bit against the purpose
of those delayed write buffers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists